National Postpartum Permanent Contraception Practices and Perceived Barriers.

Single institution-level studies have demonstrated low postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment rates after vaginal birth. To explore the national scope of the problem, we collected cross-sectional survey data from faculty at 109 U.S. academic medical centers to elicit perceptions about postpartum permanent contraception practices after vaginal birth, including barriers to and changes in practice after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, a decision that eliminated the U.S. federal protection of the right to abortion. Of 68 respondent institutions, 65 (95.6%) offered postpartum permanent contraception. A large majority (87.3%) perceived there to be a problem with postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment at their institution. Respondents at institutions with postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment rates in the bottom quartile used main operating rooms (66.7% vs 25.0% respectively, P=.032) and reported institutional culture barriers (86.7% vs 50.0%, respectively, P=.054) more frequently than respondents in the top quartile. Our national data indicate that health care culture changes and the use of labor and delivery operating rooms could increase postpartum permanent contraception fulfillment.

Contraceptive content shared on social media: an analysis of Twitter.

BACKGROUND: Information on social media may affect peoples' contraceptive decision making. We performed an exploratory analysis of contraceptive content on Twitter (recently renamed X), a popular social media platform. METHODS: We selected a random subset of 1% of publicly available, English-language tweets related to reversible, prescription contraceptive methods posted between January 2014 and December 2019. We oversampled tweets for the contraceptive patch to ensure at least 200 tweets per method. To create the codebook, we identified common themes specific to tweet content topics, tweet sources, and tweets soliciting information or providing advice. All posts were coded by two team members, and differences were adjudicated by a third reviewer. Descriptive analyses were reported with accompanying qualitative findings. RESULTS: During the study period, 457,369 tweets about reversible contraceptive methods were published, with a random sample of 4,434 tweets used for final analysis. Tweets most frequently discussed contraceptive method decision-making (26.7%) and side effects (20.5%), particularly for long-acting reversible contraceptive methods and the depot medroxyprogesterone acetate shot. Tweets about logistics of use or adherence were common for short-acting reversible contraceptives. Tweets were frequently posted by contraceptive consumers (50.6%). A small proportion of tweets explicitly requested information (6.2%) or provided advice (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware that individuals are exposed to information through Twitter that may affect contraceptive perceptions and decision making, particularly regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives. Social media is a valuable source for studying contraceptive beliefs missing in traditional health research and may be used by professionals to disseminate accurate contraceptive information.

Trauma-Informed Care Training in U.S. and Canadian Ob/Gyn Residencies.

This is a cross-sectional study investigating the prevalence and nature of trauma-informed care (TIC) training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. In our sample, 20% of programs had annual TIC training, 53% had less than annual training, and 27% had no training at all. Only 25.3% of respondents were satisfied with their current training in interpersonal trauma and TIC. A lack of facilitators to conduct such training was the primary barrier to implementing TIC. Significant opportunity exists to improve TIC education for Ob/Gyn trainees.

Opill: The Over-the-Counter Contraceptive Pill.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the first oral contraceptive pill (OCP) for over-the-counter status. This progestin-only pill contains norgestrel 0.075 mg taken daily, with a Pearl Index estimated at 4.4 (95% CI, 1.9-8.8). This formulation has an excellent safety profile, with current breast cancer as the only absolute contraindication and few relative contraindications. Ultimately, this approval has great potential to improve the accessibility of effective contraception for many pregnancy-capable Americans, especially those who have poor access to the health care system for prescription-required contraception, most notably people who hold marginalized identities. The pill's overall success in reducing rates of unintended pregnancy will rely on its availability, particularly in rural communities that may rely on one pharmacy, and affordability, especially for uninsured or underinsured individuals. However, given the need for improved contraceptive provision, particularly in abortion-restrictive settings, the over-the-counter approval of this daily OCP is a major advancement in the nation's contraceptive ecosystem.

Helping patients choose between pain control options for outpatient procedural abortion at less than 12 weeks' gestation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with their chosen pain control regimen for procedural abortion at <12 weeks' gestation in the outpatient setting. STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, we developed an instrument to evaluate predictors of satisfaction with pain control regimens among patients choosing local anesthesia alone (paracervical block with 20 mL of 1% buffered lidocaine) or local anesthesia plus intravenous (IV) moderate sedation with 100 mcg of fentanyl and 2 mg of midazolam. Our primary outcome was to identify predictors of satisfaction with both anesthesia cohorts as measured on a 4-point Likert scale, but due to high satisfaction levels in the IV group, we focused our analysis on the local anesthesia group. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 patients in the local anesthesia group and 155 in the moderate IV sedation group. The mean procedure pain scores were 6.9 (±2.1) out of 10 in the local group and 4.0 (±2.7) in the IV group (p < 0.0001). More women in the IV group (92%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the amount of pain relief they experienced compared to the local group (66%; p < 0.0001). In the univariable model, only being afraid of a minor medical procedure was predictive of less satisfaction with local anesthesia for pain control (relative risk 0.8 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9]). Age, gestational age, anticipated pain, self-reported pain tolerance, self-reported anxiety, discomfort with the abortion decision, and history of prior vaginal or cesarean delivery or induced abortion did not predict satisfaction levels. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of minor medical procedures was the only variable that predicted decreased satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion under 12 weeks. IMPLICATIONS: Reliable predictors for satisfaction with local anesthesia alone for procedural abortion in the outpatient setting remain elusive. Fear of minor medical procedures may serve as an indicator of decreased satisfaction and could be incorporated into patient counseling. Moderate IV sedation is associated with high satisfaction levels.

Consent Policies for Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia Performed by Medical Students: A National Assessment.

Background: Medical students report low confidence in their ability to perform pelvic exams. Pelvic exams under anesthesia (EUA) are one way for students to practice the exam, but this needs to be balanced with patients' bodily autonomy through explicit disclosure and consent. This study seeks to characterize U.S. medical schools' policies regarding the consent process for students to perform pelvic EUA. Materials and Methods: Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors were anonymously surveyed about their medical school affiliated hospitals' (MSAH) consent policies for pelvic EUA in general and explicitly for medical students. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to test for differences between categorical variables and thematic analysis was used to review qualitative responses. Results: A total of 87 clerkship directors completed the survey (44.4% response rate). Most MSAH explicitly consent patients for pelvic EUA (80.2%), and specifically for performance by medical students (79.1%). Sixty-nine respondents (79.3%) stated that performing pelvic EUA is important for medical student education. Five themes were identified from review of qualitative responses, including consent policy details, the importance of pelvic EUA, other opportunities for pelvic exam teaching, barriers to standardization, and outside guidance. Conclusions: The pelvic EUA is a necessary part of both surgical care and medical education but patient dignity must be protected too. Most MSAH have consent policies for students to perform pelvic EUA. Still, these policies need to be further strengthened and standardized across institutions to protect patients' rights while continuing to teach students the pelvic exam.

Second-Trimester Dilation and Evacuation: A Simulation-Based Team Training Curriculum.

Introduction: Despite the need for providers skilled in second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures, there are few second-trimester abortion training opportunities for OB/GYN residents and other health care trainees. Barriers to such training include restrictive state laws and institutional policies, lack of trained faculty, and limited procedural volume. Simulation-based D&E training is, therefore, a critical tool for OB/GYN residents and other medical professionals to achieve clinical competency. Methods: This simulation for OB/GYN residents centers on a 29-year-old woman at 18 weeks gestation with intrauterine fetal demise, requiring learners to perform a second-trimester D&E and manage an unexpected postprocedural hemorrhage. We designed the simulation to be used with a high-fidelity mannequin. Personnel roles required for the simulation included an anesthesiologist, medical assistant, OR nurse, and two OB/GYN faculty. Learner performance was assessed using a pre- and postsimulation learner evaluation, a critical action checklist, and a focus group with simulation facilitators. Results: Forty-nine residents participated over an 8-year period. Learners demonstrated improved competency performing a second-trimester D&E and increased confidence managing postprocedural hemorrhage after participating in this simulation. In addition, focus group participants reported that a majority of learners demonstrated confidence and effective communication with team members while performing in a decision-making role. Discussion: In addition to improving learners' clinical competency and surgical confidence for second-trimester D&E procedures, this simulation serves as a valuable instrument for the standardized assessment of learners' performance, as well as an opportunity for all participants to practice teamwork and communication in a high-acuity setting.

An assessment of postpartum contraception rates with evolving care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic presented new care delivery obstacles in the form of scheduling procedures and safe presentation to in-person visits. Contraception provision is an indispensable component of postpartum care that was not immune to these challenges. Given the barriers to care during the initial months of the pandemic, we sought to examine how postpartum contraception, sterilization, and visit attendance were affected during this period. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review to examine contraception initiation, sterilization, and postpartum virtual and in-person visit attendance rates during the first six months (March 15 to September 7, 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the rates in the same period in the year prior at a single tertiary academic care center. We abstracted data from the first prenatal visit through twelve weeks postpartum. RESULTS: With the initiation of virtual appointments, postpartum visit attendance significantly increased (94.6 % vs 88.4 %, p < 0.001) during the pandemic with no difference in overall contraception uptake (51 % vs 54.1 %, p = 0.2) or sterilization (11.0 % vs 11.5 %, p = 0.88). During the pandemic, contraception prescribed differed significantly with a trend towards patient-administered methods including pills, patches, and rings (21 % vs 16 %, p = 0.02). In both periods, there was a significantly younger mean age (p < 0.001), higher proportion of non-White and non-Asian race (p < 0.001), public insurance (p = 0.003, 0.004), and an established contraceptive plan prenatally (p < 0.001) in the group that received contraception. CONCLUSION: As virtual postpartum visits were instituted, contraception initiation and sterilization were maintained at pre-pandemic rates and visit attendance rose despite the obstacles to care presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. Provision of virtual postpartum visits may be a driver to maintain contraception and sterilization rates at a time, such as early in the COVID-19 pandemic, when patient care is at risk to be disrupted by social distancing, isolation, and avoidance of medical campuses.

Allergic and infectious complications of Etonogestrel implant placements: A case series.

Patients rarely experience complications at the time of Etonogestrel subdermal contraceptive implant placement. Few case reports describe infection or allergy as a complication at the time of implant insertion. In this case series, we discuss three infections and one allergic reaction following Etonogestrel implant placement, review six previous case reports of eight cases of infection or allergy, and discuss management of these complications. We highlight differential diagnosis when encountering a placement complication, considerations of dermatologic conditions when placing Etonogestrel implants, and discuss when to consider removal of the implant when a complication occurs.

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Emergency contraception.

Emergency contraception (EC) refers to several contraceptive options that can be used within a few days after unprotected or under protected intercourse or sexual assault to reduce the risk of pregnancy. Current EC options available in the United States include the copper intrauterine device (IUD), levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg IUD, oral LNG (such as Plan B One-Step, My Way, Take Action), and oral ulipristal acetate (UPA) (ella). These clinical recommendations review the indications, effectiveness, safety, and side effects of emergency contraceptive methods; considerations for the use of EC by specific patient populations and in specific clinical circumstances and current barriers to emergency contraceptive access. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of LNG IUDs for emergency contraceptive use; address the effects of repeated use of UPA at different times in the same menstrual cycle; assess the impact on ovulation of initiating or reinitiating different regimens of regular hormonal contraception following UPA use; and elucidate effective emergency contraceptive pill options by body mass indices or weight.

Acute complications with same-day versus overnight cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 14 to 16 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate if same-day cervical preparation is associated with a clinically acceptable complication rate compared with overnight osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation (D&E). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, noninferiority, cohort study compared complication rates for same-day versus overnight cervical preparation with D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation. Cervical preparation was achieved with misoprostol, osmotic dilators, or both. Our primary outcome was the acute complication rate, defined as: hemorrhage (≥500 mL); hospitalization or hospital transfer; transfusion; or unplanned procedure occurring within 24 hours of the index procedure. Secondarily we evaluated nonmajor (re-aspiration, suture repair of cervical laceration, uterine tamponade, or emergency department only transfer) and major (transfusion, uterine artery embolization, abdominal surgery, or hospital admission) complications separately. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was used to perform an adjusted analysis, taking into account age, ethnicity, clinic location, insurance, gestational age, gravidity, and prior pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,319 subjects (n = 864 same-day, n = 455 overnight). Same-day cervical preparation patients were more likely to have Medicaid and a prior vaginal delivery. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, acute complication rates for same-day were noninferior to overnight preparation (unadjusted 0.93% vs 1.98%, difference of -1.05%, CI: -2.48% to 0.38%; adjusted difference -0.50%, CI: -1.45 to 0.44%). Only one major complication in the same-day group, a cervical laceration resulting in hemorrhage requiring transfusion, occurred in the entire sample. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective review, same-day cervical preparation was noninferior to overnight preparation for D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation, both with low complication rates. IMPLICATIONS: For early second trimester dilation and evacuation, same-day cervical preparation should be considered a safe alternative to overnight cervical preparation.

We Must Address the Antiobesity Biases We Espouse in Our Operating Rooms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe anti-obesity bias in medical education including impact on patients, growth of biases over time, and education-based initiatives aimed at reducing bias. DESIGN: We reviewed available literature on anti-obesity bias in medical education and initiatives to address this bias. SETTING: Information from a wide variety of medical educational settings was included. PARTICIPANTS: N/A RESULTS: Anti-obesity bias in healthcare is an independent risk factor for poor health outcomes and is pervasive throughout the culture of medicine. Medical students identify operating rooms as the number one location for anti-obesity comments, and students' biases increase throughout medical school. We propose several interventions (the 6 I's) as the next step in addressing this bias.

Reproductive Justice: A Case-Based, Interactive Curriculum.

Introduction: Reproductive injustices such as forced sterilization, preventable maternal morbidity and mortality, restricted access to family planning services, and policy-driven environmental violence undermine reproductive autonomy and health outcomes, with disproportionate impact on historically marginalized communities. However, curricula focused on reproductive justice (RJ) are lacking in medical education. Methods: We designed a novel, interactive, case-based RJ curriculum for postclerkship medical students. This curriculum was created using published guidelines on best practices for incorporating RJ in medical education. The session included a prerecorded video on the history of RJ, an article, and four interactive cases. Students engaged in a 2-hour small-group session, discussing key learning points of each case. We evaluated the curriculum's impact with a pre- and postsurvey and focus group. Results: Sixty-eight students participated in this RJ curriculum in October 2020 and March 2021. Forty-one percent of them completed the presurvey, and 46% completed the postsurvey. Twenty-two percent completed both surveys. Ninety percent of respondents agreed that RJ was relevant to their future practice, and 87% agreed that participating in this session would impact their clinical practice. Most respondents (81%) agreed that more RJ content is needed. Focus group participants appreciated the case-based, interactive format and the intersectionality within the cases. Discussion: This interactive curriculum is an innovative and effective way to teach medical students about RJ and its relevance to clinical practice. Walking alongside patients as they accessed reproductive health care in a case-based curriculum improved students' comfort and self-reported knowledge on several RJ topics.

Abortion as Essential Health Care and the Critical Role Your Practice Can Play in Protecting Abortion Access.

Few obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) provide abortion care, resulting in abortion being separated from other reproductive health care. This segregation of services disrupts the ob-gyn patient-clinician relationship, generates needless costs, delays access to abortion care, and contributes to stigma. General ob-gyns have both the skills and the knowledge to incorporate abortion into their clinical practices. In this way, they can actively contribute to the protection of abortion access now with the loss of federal protection for abortion under Roe v Wade . For those who live where abortion remains legal, now is the time to start providing abortions and enhancing your abortion-referral process. For all, regardless of state legislation, ob-gyns must be leaders in advocacy by facilitating abortion care-across state lines, using telehealth, or with self-managed abortion-and avoiding any contribution to the criminalization of those who seek or obtain essential abortion care. Our patients deserve a specialty-wide concerted effort to deliver comprehensive reproductive health care to the fullest extent.